Sasha Zuhrovet (
zuhrovet) wrote in
hexarchate_rpg2019-05-24 08:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
toasting and debriefing
Sasha has messaged the team, summoning them to a meeting in the common room. After sending the message, she heads there herself, and starts pouring shots of rosemary arak. She gives a glass to Sulen as they enter the room, holding it out formally, with both hands; she gives Reshad a similarly formal presentation, and an equally formal smile. Seyli gets a choice between arak and sparkling water, and a lopsided grin.
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
"Ione, can you give us some background on the emotions you can detect without touching someone?" Sasha asks. "Is there some baseline required intensity? How do you deal with conflicting impulses, or layers? How much contextual information do you need for interpretation?"
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
"Anything I'd notice without touching someone has to be overpowering for that person," she explains with the tone of someone who's used these exact words many times before. "Of course my usual comparison is angry telekinetics, which doesn't help here -- if it's bothering me without being deliberately looked for it needs to be pretty much the only thing that person's feeling. Blinding rage, primal fear, that kind of thing? I have very strong shields that even I can't deactivate, so it takes intense and focused emotion to get through them. Emotions alone are junk data; it's only because we were in the same room," she's pretty sure she'd still have been feeling all that down the hall, "and I was hearing the conversation that I had any clue what the reaction was to. But -- if something's got layers to it it probably isn't strong enough. Conflicting impulses just overlay each other so it's not hard to separate them out; a conflicting impulse by itself is a relatively strong feeling? Usually not strong enough though. It's because of the nature of the situation that I think Jedao projected so much. More than I was prepared for or expecting. I'd have worried it was intentionally amplified for me to sway me to his side if I had any reason to believe he knew anything at all about me."
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
Sasha curls her fingers on "angry telekinetics," instructing the grid to mark that phrase for later. "So Jedao is terrified of this contact whose name he didn't give us," she summarizes. "Sulen, Virmad, Gerae--does that match your reading?"
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
He pauses and looks at Sulen again, not sure if he should offer such wild speculation. But then, what’s the worst that can happen? Sasha already thinks he’s an unreliable flake who gets distracted by every pretty face he sees, and maybe Sulen and Gerae will back him up. “He didn’t say so explicitly, but reading between the lines — and reading his signifiers — what he said suggested that this ‘co-conspirator’ who’s blackmailing him may be the one responsible for what happened — happens — will happen — well, won’t happen now, I suppose — at Hellspin Fortress. Or, rather, that Jedao did what he did on his co-conspirator’s orders. Not exactly a strong character recommendation, but if it’s true it would alleviate some of our concerns about Jedao’s reliability.”
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
"Grid, could you play back the images of Jedao's hands on Screen Two, please?" Sasha asks. "Starting when Gerae enters his room."
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
"That's not a tremor," she says, as the recording begins. "It's Shuos sign language."
She gives it a beat for the implications to sink in. "That was 'heptarch's orders?'If you turn the camera to me, you can spot the other half of the conversation. I thought it would be useful to approach the interrogation on multiple levels."
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
This must be what Reshad wanted to ask about, earlier. Did Sulen not brief Gerae, or did Reshad not consult with Sulen? It hasn't been that long since Reshad left Sasha's office, so Sasha only needs to enter a couple of commands on her tablet to establish that Reshad went directly to the room where Jedao is held, without talking to Sulen or sending a message through the grid. But why in all the hells would she have a problem with Sulen? It makes no sense.
Re: how was that conversation with Jedao, anyway?
"Ah- and he mentioned that his co-conspirator is Nirai."
"In the last - there." She gestures at the screen "He said, 'my life is in your hands.' I took it as surrender."
How she wants to show emotion at that. Instead, she focuses on the subtle differences between his sign language and hers, shown clearly by Cantata's expert surveillance.
With Ione's revelation of- what sort of ability is that, anyway? Certainly nothing she's heard of- it seems even feeling strongly may be dangerous.
can we count our enemies?
"Thank you. I believe I mentioned, Jedao has been corresponding with an anonymous Nirai. There is a draft of a message protesting the collateral damage from an experimental weapon design, but he never sent it. We'll want confirmation, but I expect Jedao's correspondent and this co-conspirator are identical."
Sasha folds her hands together. If this were a Naxorian strategy session, she'd toast again to signal a shift in topic, but half the room is still cradling glasses of arak as if they came from Ashari, and uneven rounds are the opposite of auspicious. "One question that arises: are our adversaries cooperating with each other? We know that Jedao's co-conspirator--let's call him Comet--was interested in the rifts, and that Jedao believes he is undying. We know that Quill wanted to eliminate Jedao, or at very least keep him from all knowledge of the rifts. Might these be related? What evidence would we need to confirm or disprove this hypothesis?"
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
"Jedao had come back a minimum of three times, in my era," she explains. "Real details are thin on the deck, but history shows him well past when he could have been kept alive. If he failed in a way that got him immortality..." She trails off, and sips her arak again, this time taking a substantial amount of it.
Re: can we count our enemies?
"It seems simpler to assume that the mechanism is the same, for both the future Jedao and his collaborator, but that the price of the bargain is too high."
Sasha had a tutor, once, who was preoccupied with the literary motif of contracts with the undying. She wrote four separate essays explaining that creatures made solely of air and fire were scientifically impossible. She's not sure what to make of the fact that that endless, ancient poetry reading is turning out to have been practical job training. She'll have to ask Alaric again, about his heart: both the protections and the mechanism seem suddenly relevant.
Re: can we count our enemies?
He adds to Sasha, "It would be useful to know anything else Jedao can tell us. Killed but it didn't stick is a good start, since it rules out things like making yourself physically immutable or, I don't know, a cloud of nanomachines."
Re: can we count our enemies?
Sasha nods. "You recommend, then, that for threat assessment, we engage Jedao in detailed conversation. Is there information that we need to keep from him, or control his access to, while we are doing so?"
Re: can we count our enemies?
[GM side comment]
Re: can we count our enemies?
"We've already denied him to the Kel, and learned something about his blackmailer. We're in process of denying his death to Flute."
"If we mean to seek his collaboration, he needs the same information the rest of us have."
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
"There is no way for us to be safe. There cannot be, as long as Quill is coordinating with heptarchate or hexarchate agents. The only question is whether we move first, or react to our opponents. With Jedao, we must--the proverb I learned is, 'spin the web and watch for scissors'. We listen to what he tells us, and what he omits, and check everything we can. The judgment on what to do with him is not ours alone." Stars in hell, will Ashari have opinions. "But we have some time, on the way to Autumn Pyre, and I expect on the journey through the rift, as well. We can watch, and learn."
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
"Exactly so. I do not trust that Jedao has our best interests in mind. I trust that he'll be himself." Softer: "You're right to be wary, but if we treat him as an enemy, we are likely to make one where it isn't needed."
Sulen and Sasha turn the conversation to maximums, and she follows along. "Those limits likely depend on our strategy," she offers.
"We've already denied him to the heptarchs, assuming we aren't being pursued by Kel moths. We're denying his death to Flute." Firmly, brooking no argument. "I do believe he wants to see the -archate fall. I hope he decides to help us, but we probably have a hand in that, too."
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
[GM reaction]
Re: can we count our enemies?
station sensors
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
Re: can we count our enemies?
let's fight about babies
Re: let's fight about babies